PDA

View Full Version : YO questions


Fantine
08-09-2008, 07:26 PM
Hello, everyone, and happy August! I have a question about how to do a YO in a pattern called Lacy Diamonds. Here are the first 3 rows:

Multiple of 6 + 1

Row 1 (RS): *K1, K2tog, YO, K1, YO, K2tog tbl; rep from * to last st, K1.

Row 2 and every even row: Purl

Row 3: K2tog; *YO, K3, YO, sl 1 twice, p2sso; rep from * to last five stitches, YO, K3, YO, K2tog tbl.

The YOs are between knit stitches, so I just use the usual bring the yarn in front of the needle, or do I need to wrap it around the needle, as if I were doing a YO between purl stitches? I'm wondering if the K2tog tbl makes a difference. Thanks for any help, and let me know if you guys need the rest of the pattern.

ArtLady1981
08-09-2008, 08:29 PM
By putting the 'yarn forward', aka "in front of the work"...aka "YO"..you will be creating 1 new stitch when you execute your next knit stitch, or your next maneuver, such as the K2Tog tbl as you described.

This is the most important thing to remember: does my method of YO create 1 new stitch? Am I leaving behind 1 new stitch? If it creates 2...you've done it wrong. If it doesn't create 1 new stitch, you've done it wrong.

I think you are on the right track! :thumbsup:

Fantine
08-09-2008, 09:07 PM
By putting the 'yarn forward', aka "in front of the work"...aka "YO"..you will be creating 1 new stitch when you execute your next knit stitch, or your next maneuver, such as the K2Tog tbl as you described.

This is the most important thing to remember: does my method of YO create 1 new stitch? Am I leaving behind 1 new stitch? If it creates 2...you've done it wrong. If it doesn't create 1 new stitch, you've done it wrong.

I think you are on the right track! :thumbsup:

Thank you, ArtLady. I thought I was doing it right, too, but something is going wrong, because I'm not ending up with the correct number of stitches for Row 3. :help: I'll go back to the drawing board and try to see what exactly I'm doing wrong, if not the YO.

MerigoldinWA
08-10-2008, 12:33 AM
Row 1 of the pattern works out correctly over a multiple of 6+1. So if you are doing it correctly it should work. You have the right idea, start over carefully and see if you can figure out what is going on. Try it on a sample of say, only 13 stitches and see if you can get it to turn out.

I was trying your pattern. I wonder if you wrote row 3 out incorrectly? YO, K3, YO, sl 1 twice, p2sso; looking at this part I couldn't figure out what to do, because it says to YO and then slip 1 twice and pass the 2 slipped stitches over. Over what? There is nothing to slip them over. Maybe there is another k1 after the two slips.:shrug:

suzeeq
08-10-2008, 12:45 AM
sl 1 twice, p2sso;

Yeah, that should probably be - sl 2, k1 p2sso.

Fantine
08-10-2008, 09:42 AM
Yeah, that should probably be - sl 2, k1 p2sso.

Absolutely correct -- I did not type Row 3 correctly. Sorry, ladies!

Fantine
08-10-2008, 09:43 AM
Row 1 of the pattern works out correctly over a multiple of 6+1. So if you are doing it correctly it should work. You have the right idea, start over carefully and see if you can figure out what is going on. Try it on a sample of say, only 13 stitches and see if you can get it to turn out.

I was trying your pattern. I wonder if you wrote row 3 out incorrectly? looking at this part I couldn't figure out what to do, because it says to YO and then slip 1 twice and pass the 2 slipped stitches over. Over what? There is nothing to slip them over. Maybe there is another k1 after the two slips.:shrug:

Yes, sorry to mislead you. The pattern looks very nice in the photo, so I'm definitely going to persevere until I get it right!