View Single Post
Old 12-26-2012, 03:12 PM   #24
Knit On!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,457 Times in 6,038 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to suzeeq
Originally Posted by mojo11 View Post
If the pattern depends on you doing a specific type of decrease (say ssk rather than k2tog) to make it look right, then it gets a little more complex but only as much as you have to use the "matching" type of increase to make it look the same.
You could actually use KLL or KRL to make an inc that looks close enough to k2tog/ssk.
sue- knitting heretic

suzeeq is offline   Reply With Quote