12-22-2006, 11:00 AM
|
#11
|
|
Knit On!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,442 Times in 6,029 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by Ingrid
|
|
I think that with an ssk, you're knitting the twisted stitches through the back loop, essentially, so it untwists them.
|
Not when I make them. I know there's an `improved' ssk, where you slip the 2nd st tbl, but I don't see how that's an improvement as it twists the 2nd st. My SSKs are basically like a sl, k1, psso. Sl knitwise, k the next stitch, then pass the slipped stitch over as if I'd knit it. Maybe I've been doing it `wrong'.
No, I haven't.... I just looked at Amy's video of SSK and that's exactly how I do mine.
sue
|
|
|
|
This advertising will not be shown to registered members. Join our free online community today!
|
|
12-22-2006, 04:15 PM
|
#12
|
|
Moderator
Mod Squad
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pleasant Valley, NY
Posts: 29,231
Thanks: 16
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,675 Posts
|
When I do a ssk, I slip two stitches knitwise, individually, then reinsert my left needle through the front of those stitches on the right, so basically the right needle is in the back loops of the stitches on the left and then knit from there.
__________________
"Trust the pattern!"
Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana.
Hop aboard while we follow the cloud-covered van of knitting harmony, man!! Woooo!! --Hedgehog
IngridKH on Ravelry
|
|
|
|
12-22-2006, 04:50 PM
|
#13
|
|
Knit On!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,442 Times in 6,029 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by Ingrid
|
|
When I do a ssk, I slip two stitches knitwise, individually, then reinsert my left needle through the front of those stitches on the right, so basically the right needle is in the back loops of the stitches on the left and then knit from there.
|
Okay, yeah. That's the same way I do it, too.
sue
|
|
|
|
01-02-2007, 07:44 PM
|
#14
|
|
Casting On
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Is there anyway for an SSK to not be a decrease?
I have a pattern that says to do a given number of SSK's in a given round as well as do 4 k2tog's. However, when finished with the round the pattern says that I will only have decreased by the 4 k2tog's. Is the pattern wrong?
|
|
|
|
01-02-2007, 09:01 PM
|
#15
|
|
Knit On!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,442 Times in 6,029 Posts
|
Re: Is there anyway for an SSK to not be a decrease?
|
Originally Posted by kristila
|
|
I have a pattern that says to do a given number of SSK's in a given round as well as do 4 k2tog's. However, when finished with the round the pattern says that I will only have decreased by the 4 k2tog's. Is the pattern wrong?
|
Can you type out the instructions for that round?
sue
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007, 12:35 AM
|
#16
|
|
Casting On
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Sure, I will do that when I get home; it's from Two Old Bags.
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007, 04:13 AM
|
#17
|
|
Casting On
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Here is that round's instructions:
Starting with 160 stitches; Knit 54 sts to 1st marker. Slip marker, ssk and k to 2 sts before 2nd marker, k2tog. Slip marker, k 54 sts to 3rd marker. Slip marker, ssk, knit to 2 sts before BOR marker, k2tog. After each descrease round you will have two stitches less between the markers. For example, after this round you will have 156 sts total.
As I typed it, it occured to me that the error was in reading the pattern. Perhaps I should only do 1 ssk at a time, not as I did originally which was 'ssk and knit' up until 2 sts before a marker. Thanks for any advice.
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007, 06:18 AM
|
#18
|
|
Knit On!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,442 Times in 6,029 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by kristila
|
Here is that round's instructions:
Starting with 160 stitches; Knit 54 sts to 1st marker. Slip marker, ssk and k to 2 sts before 2nd marker, k2tog. Slip marker, k 54 sts to 3rd marker. Slip marker, ssk, knit to 2 sts before BOR marker, k2tog. After each descrease round you will have two stitches less between the markers. For example, after this round you will have 156 sts total.
As I typed it, it occured to me that the error was in reading the pattern. Perhaps I should only do 1 ssk at a time, not as I did originally which was 'ssk and knit' up until 2 sts before a marker. Thanks for any advice.
|
Yes, that's correct; you would ssk, then knit the stitches until 2 before the marker, k2tog, etc.
sue
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007, 08:33 PM
|
#19
|
|
Casting On
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks. I wish the pattern had send 'then' not 'and'. :)
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007, 08:44 PM
|
#20
|
|
Knit On!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,442 Times in 6,029 Posts
|
But all patterns are written obscurely to exclude people who don't know the `secret knitter's language'.
sue
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.
|
|
|