Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2005, 09:17 AM   #1
Quietheart
1st Leg of the Journey
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 136
Thanks: 31
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Pattern Help please..
This is what I am working on: http://www.livejournal.com/community...rs/110889.html

Other than having some difficulty casting on a small # to size 16 needles for the smallest size (I cast on very loosely and it's still difficult any other ideas?) , the pattern is fairly simple.

Until I get to the very end.

I have two "rows" of live knitting , one on a stitch holder and one on my needle and it says "weave" them together. I tried using the 3 needle cast off, that left a large ridge. From looking at the pattern, it appears it uses some type of weave that is invisible.
So what does "weave" mean? Mattress stitch didn't work because they are live so I kept dropping stitchs while trying to do it. Any other suggestions what this could mean?

Thanks.
QuietHeart
Quietheart is offline   Reply With Quote

 

This advertising will not be shown to registered members. Join our free online community today!

Old 06-29-2005, 09:19 AM   #2
KellyK
Sock Yarn Bliss
 
KellyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berwyn, Illinois
Posts: 22,219
Thanks: 187
Thanked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to KellyK
Try kitchener stitch? (Amy has a video...)
KellyK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 09:36 AM   #3
Nuno930
Working the Gusset
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,074
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
I really need to make one of these
__________________
Nik
It's better to be hated for who you are then be loved for who you are not ~ Van Zant
Nuno930 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 09:58 AM   #4
Quietheart
1st Leg of the Journey
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 136
Thanks: 31
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I tried lots of soaker patterns, this one was the simplest and actually fit over a cloth diaper. Although I struggled with ssk. I have the hardest time getting the left needle back under both stitchs to knit them together. I have watched the video and for some reason, I have the worst time getting the needle under the second stitch. It maybe this woolease, it's very splitty *is that a word?*


QuietHeart
Quietheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 10:07 AM   #5
Julie
Instepping Out
 
Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,325
Thanks: 10
Thanked 78 Times in 64 Posts
Splitty is definitely a word...at least around here it is

Have you watched Amy's video on kitchener stitch (weaving)? I had read descriptions and it sounded sooo complex, but then once I watched the video it made perfect sense. Of course she makes it look easy....but really, it's not super hard.
__________________
Knitter's Geek Code
KCR+ Exp+ SPM+ Steel+ Bam+ Addi++ Pl-- Wool++ Cot Lux+ Stash Scale+ Fin !Ent Int FI> Tex Lace Felt Flat Circ+ Dpn- ML+ Swatch+ KIP+ Blog+ SNB> EZ? FO+ WIP3 Gauge W+ Alt Sw
Julie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 10:10 AM   #6
KellyK
Sock Yarn Bliss
 
KellyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Berwyn, Illinois
Posts: 22,219
Thanks: 187
Thanked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to KellyK
I have consulted Mr. Webster...he says he will ADD "Splitty" STRAIGHT AWAY...he apologizes for leaving it out in the first place. His exact words..."What in GAWDS name was I THINKING????"
KellyK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 10:12 AM   #7
Ingrid
Moderator
Mod Squad
 
Ingrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pleasant Valley, NY
Posts: 29,583
Thanks: 21
Thanked 2,240 Times in 1,837 Posts
Originally Posted by Quietheart
I tried lots of soaker patterns, this one was the simplest and actually fit over a cloth diaper. Although I struggled with ssk. I have the hardest time getting the left needle back under both stitchs to knit them together. I have watched the video and for some reason, I have the worst time getting the needle under the second stitch. It maybe this woolease, it's very splitty *is that a word?*


QuietHeart
Sometimes if you can't get the left needle through the front of the st on the right needle, you can "take them back" and put the right needle in as if to knit through the back loop. I think the reason for the ssk is to twist the stitches in the first place. As long as you don't twist them back, (just put you left needle through the front loop and transfer), you can try it that way.
Ingrid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 10:58 AM   #8
Quietheart
1st Leg of the Journey
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 136
Thanks: 31
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Oh Im so glad mr webster has seen things our way!! *laugh*

and yes I have had to put them back on the left needle regularly , for some reason the second stitch tightens up too much for me to get through all the strands. I still think its splitty's fault

Thanks for all your help. I did go and watch amy's video on kitchener stitch, she does make it look easy , so we'll see how it goes when I finish this next soaker!

QH
Quietheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 12:00 PM   #9
Hildegard_von_Knittin
2nd Sock, I Rock
 
Hildegard_von_Knittin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: dissertation research hell
Posts: 11,078
Thanks: 107
Thanked 205 Times in 172 Posts
HEY!!!! I think there's a mistake in this pattern!
Cast on 56 [72, 80, 88, 96] sts. Join for knitting in the round.

Now. According to the pattern, the sizes are for newborn [s, m, l, todddler], and the circumference of each increases by 2 inches for each size. Soooo why is there a 16 stitch difference between newborn and s, but only an 8 stitch difference between the rest? (and 8 makes sense because of the guage of 5 sts/inch) ANYWAY, so I think for newborn you're supposed to cast on 64 stitches.

Of course I could totally be wrong. And this would mess up the rest of the pattern too (when you place stitches on a holder you'd end up with 52 remaining instead 44) Since I don't have kids, I don't know if newborns are that much smaller than a 0-6 month old. Maybe the "newborn" should really be "premie".... that would make sense. maybe

Never mind. ignore me. lots of people have made it without these problems. But since I am a math freak and I obsess about stupid things, I've never made it. i DO have a much easier pattern (which makes much more sense mathematically), but it's knit flat and then seamed.
__________________
I'm back!
Hildegard_von_Knittin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 12:15 PM   #10
Ingrid
Moderator
Mod Squad
 
Ingrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pleasant Valley, NY
Posts: 29,583
Thanks: 21
Thanked 2,240 Times in 1,837 Posts
Newborns are A LOT smaller. They grow really fast, too. 8 stiches worth, at least, :D
Ingrid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.