Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2007, 08:15 AM   #1
mwedzi
Working the Gusset
 
mwedzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 29
Thanked 90 Times in 69 Posts
Double hem but for neckline?
In the never-ending attempt to have stockinette without curling, I'm knitting a sweater with a double hem. I think this is the term, I don't know any of the proper terminology. Basically I provisionally CO stitches, knit stockinette for some time, then folded the bit in half, put the provisional stitches onto another needle, and knit the last row and the first row of stitches together (like a 3-needle BO without the BO) and continued on. This gives the appearance of just stockinette without rolling.

Now I am wondering if there is a way I can do this for the neck with a scoop-type neckline. I can think of one or two ways, but I don't like them so much. One way is kinda fiddly, involving putting end stitches from the sloping part of the shaping onto stitch holders. The other is just knitting a double hem separately and then sewing it on. I thought maybe I could also pick up sts, leave them on onr needle, cut the yarn and pick up stitches from that, knit stockinette, then fold it over and do a 3 needle BO with the last row and the first row of sts. This is the way I'm leaning towards now, but I'm wondering if there is some other simpler or more natural way of doing this. Anyone know of anything?

thanks.
__________________
--Nikki http://knitensity.blogspot.com/

mwedzi is offline   Reply With Quote

 

This advertising will not be shown to registered members. Join our free online community today!

Old 07-19-2007, 09:16 AM   #2
suzeeq
Knit On!
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,450 Times in 6,035 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to suzeeq
I think it's the Hourglass sweater in Last Minute Knitted Gifts(?) that has a hem like this. You do a turning row, any increases to match decreases you might have done in the inch or so before the turning row, then knit a stitch on the the needle together with a stitch along the row where your edge meets when you turn the hem under and BO. Don't know if that was clear enough...
__________________
sue- knitting heretic

suzeeq is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to suzeeq For This Useful Post:
mwedzi (07-19-2007)
Old 07-19-2007, 09:25 AM   #3
mwedzi
Working the Gusset
 
mwedzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 29
Thanked 90 Times in 69 Posts
Thanks, Sue. I don't know what a "turning row" means, though. I've googled Hourglass and see what you mean, though, and this is what I want in a scoop neck version. It looks kinda boat neck? I can't tell.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jacksviv/476093581/

If the neck edge is straight, doing it would be easier, I think. Just do a row where I purl on the RS (is this a "turning row"?) then knit some more, fold over, and knit the stitches from the last row I knit together with the stitches from that special row. Is this how it's done with the Hourglass?
__________________
--Nikki http://knitensity.blogspot.com/

mwedzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 09:41 AM   #4
suzeeq
Knit On!
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,450 Times in 6,035 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to suzeeq
Yes, the turning row is a purl row on the WS, but you don't knit the stitches from that row, it's the one you fold over. You would do it on a row 5 or 6 rows down from it, depending on how deep you want the hem. One inch would probably be about right.
__________________
sue- knitting heretic

suzeeq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 09:48 AM   #5
mwedzi
Working the Gusset
 
mwedzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 29
Thanked 90 Times in 69 Posts
Originally Posted by suzeeq View Post
Yes, the turning row is a purl row on the WS, but you don't knit the stitches from that row, it's the one you fold over. You would do it on a row 5 or 6 rows down from it, depending on how deep you want the hem. One inch would probably be about right.
Ahhh, yes, that's what I did for the hem, a purl row on the RS. I think the Hourglass way will not work because of the slope of the neckline. It would be pretty difficult doing this with a v- or scoop-neck, no? Because you couldn't do one straight row of sts, but have to do it horizontally and vertically over a slope.

I think I may just go with the last way I mentioned in my first post.
__________________
--Nikki http://knitensity.blogspot.com/

mwedzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 09:53 AM   #6
suzeeq
Knit On!
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 27,765
Thanks: 160
Thanked 6,450 Times in 6,035 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to suzeeq
Well the Hourglass pattern has decs on the rows just before the turning row, then incs on the hem rows to match the incs. You probably couldn't easily do it on a V or scoop, no, but it might be able to be done.
__________________
sue- knitting heretic

suzeeq is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neckline Help!!! ABC's Mom How-to Questions 2 04-01-2012 05:32 PM
making a double thickness neckline on sweater? Darby How-to Questions 5 03-02-2009 01:19 PM
Double knitting project -- Heart Double knit hot pad vrousseau How-to Questions 4 04-05-2007 07:06 PM
help with neckline chrstne How-to Questions 2 03-23-2007 07:20 PM
Neckline help maxmom How-to Questions 1 02-27-2007 08:49 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.